Noble Corporal Agarn

It was the end of an era, a short era, rather mundane but still an era. James, my stalwart landlord informed me that he was coming up to Donald. Pick up his mail and that sort of thing, going to bring Marco, a friend of his who wanted some advice as to how to conduct deep research into the deadly herbicide/poison Paraquat, of which, due to it’s toxicity and the fact that it has been sprayed on our food since 1964 causes Dementia and Parkinson’s Disease, we will all eventually succumb to one or both of these diseases. Paraguay Dementia, I called it, but when James, my erstwhile landlord turned up, no Marco, seems his car broke down on the way to Beaufort, and Rachel had to go and pick him up. Though, when James arrived he was very friendly at the gate but when I let him in after opening the gate and we were at the front door, which I was unlocking, he declared that the lock on the front security screen door was his, which of course I agreed with, even though I had changed both front and rear security door locks, as once installed, any fittings belong to the landlord. This was fine but then he abruptly declared, quite loudly that he could cut the door off he if wanted, he seemed very angry about something, I don’t know what though. Then he told me that while he was in the ADF, Australian Defence Force, while in Iraq or East Timor or both, that he had killed babies, not a single or one baby, but multiple babies, actual number unknown, whether it was dozens or hundreds or a handful, or whether they had their own extermination squad or unit, is unknown to me. I looked at him sternly and my first thoughts were, Noble Warrior, Gallant Soldier, Special Forces Baby Killer, but my admiration increased rapidly, as I gazed at this ex Corporal towering over me, eyes bulging, arms tensed and slightly out as if to say, Yes I am a stern, tough, ruthless soldier of fortune, drugged out of my head but that’s because the war fucked me up so much. He then proceeded to tell me all about the Marijauna growers in Donald, he roared about how every second house was growing dope, Shane grew 50 plants, but the cops had to go around and tell him to tone it down, others throughout the night would howl about tales of Mary the Supermarket owner having 16 Marijauna plants in her hydroponic setup in her shed, I didn’t know and didn’t care. James then told me about how his mate Allan or something shot up heroin and tried to commit suicide, after Allan had shot up the deadly dose, James looked at him and said, “What have you done, you’re going to fuck yourself up, what are you doing man”, not I will call you an ambulance, since you’re dying. Once we were in the lounge room, I was playing some music on YouTube, he told me to turn it down, it wasn’t up very loud, not even louder than conversation. I told him politely that I was listening to this piece of music, to which he responded with another, :Turn it down”, except in a much angrier, loud, harsh, sort of bully boy type of tone. I instantly thought, “Baby Killer, Noble Warrior, Brave Corporal Agarn”, he then said to me, quite angrily once again, “You’re my guest, this is my house”, to which I replied, “We have an agreement that I live here, not as your guest”. Then he started exclaiming that it was so good to be back in Donald and that it was going to be good living in Donald again. After some time I began to feel sick, this was the Saturday, and began throwing up in the bucket in my bedroom, James, nobility personified, stood at my open bedroom door and went into a story about the bloke who committed suicide in my lounge room, or attempted suicide, the one he looked at and said “You are fucked up, man”, and then told me he had a lot on his shoulders, he was getting back pay from the army for six years of service where he was underpaid, he had the Land Rates office on his back, as it was incredibly taxing on him that he had no intention of paying his land tax, and that was a burden, and he had to sell Donald, and he droned on and on. I must add here that while at my front door on the Friday night, he said to me, “Anyone touches my stuff and I will smash their head in, I brought up my bobcat so I could bulldoze someone’s house”, I glanced over at his flat bed truck and indeed saw that he had a bobcat on the back, I wondered at this stage if he was sane, was he really going to bulldoze someone’s house down. So back to Saturday night, I thought I better get out of here, I was throwing up violently, James was , in a round about way threatening my life, I felt like I had been poisoned so I called for an ambulance and was taken to Horsham emergency department, where I slept on the floor for a while, first time in three days that I had slept, kept awake and pestered by the criminal gang known as The Barleycorn, led by the absolute putrid Peter Fiieellder, meth amphetamine addict extraordinaire, and then managed to be given a hospital bed for a few hours.

So today I went about organising temporary accomodation, consulting solicitors as to legal action, forced and illegal eviction, veiled threats, having to pay for emergency services, pay for food, etc, tomorrow I shall be having a nice long talk to the Police and consulting Victorian Legal Aid and finding a property solicitor to handle my lawsuit. It is at this point that I recall an anecdote James told me, he was in the back of a helicopter in Iraq, and he saw a bloke welding and working on his car in the early morning, he said something like,”Is that an gun or a flash down there,” and once the computer gunnery devices picked up the flash, the Rotor cannons went into action and chopped the bloke on the ground to shreds, destroyed the whole street, all the while Corporal Agarn had his head in his hands screaming in terror, he said the noise was deafening. So, bye bye Donald.

Force Ten From Navarone

Force Ten From Navarone.

It was with steely eyed determination that they embarked on their mission. They supplied themselves with the necessary provisions and headed towards their destination, four, maybe five to a transport unit, Unit 23 sallied forth with grim determination. They had been given the heads up, the AOK, and were to rendezvous with their newly aligned compatriots at the Horsham place, the one they never dared talk about, except in silent whispers when all others slept through the night. They could not believe their good fortune, their bitter enemies now their boon allies, they were overjoyed, they had heard the word from the man himself, “It’s okay, they’re all homosexual paedophile rapist drug addicted child porn watching mates now”, the word was true, a massive coup that would result in the downfall of the state of Victoria, and then onwards to Canberra and then the rest of the world.

They had armed themselves with drinks of their choice and their favourite smoking comestibles and sallied forth into the market place. “We’re here for the party and a bit of a chat, a bit of a meet and greet”, the desk receptionist smiled and gave them a Dexter wink, “Sure thing, come this way and you can have a chat with the Boss”, they were impressed with that, and were guided towards their doom.

Once comfortable in a predestined office, they opened up and ,nay, dare I say, began bragging about their illustrious efforts in the seedy denizens of The Underworld, their brazen exploits were laid bare and they chatted relentlessly into the night, quite at ease with their pipes and drinks and emboldened, now that they were, IN, with the cops.

Dance of the Wild Mincies

It was with some anticipation that the residents of Donald greeted that particular evening. It was to be attended by some of the best dancing masters that the Mincies could provide, they gathered by the dozen and capered about in frenzied delight to the subtle almost invisible sounds of the music master. Some Mincies though, lost their heads and were soon swept up by the almost salivating local Mincies fishermen and fisherwomen if there were any, into the nets that had been lain, and soon many a Mincies were headed to the Horsham markets for processing. He could hear the howls of “I’m almost two kilometres tall” and “I need a dozen towels so the boys can take a shower”, echoing down the byways and highways of the Wimmera Mallee, fowl though their wretched stench was, cantankerous to the assailed nostrils, a veritable smote by fire wrought by the Hand of The Master.

Now Mincies had been caught , many and far and wide, 3768 was the number of their slain fallen comrades, left to rot in a despicable Siberian Gulag, living on a crust of Rye bread and a bowl of gruel a day, such was their fate. Had they not thought for a while, then they may have reasoned that if they could get their dirty little mits on an invisibility cloak, suit, whatever, then it would stand to reason that other people could get one as well, losers.

Dark Evil

Listen to Australia's Dark Evil from 1975. Martin North, John Adams, the Ministry of People. John, this is it. We have attempted, Martin, over the last month to bring the true history of Australia to the public's attention because we both thought it was the public interest. I had attempted to engage with the lawyers of the ABC to ask them that they would release me from these legal conditions that I have signed and that bore no fruit. I then went to the Minister for Communication and asked her to exercise her powers under federal law to publish the tape in the national interest and she wasn't willing to do so. So Martin, we are taking a very sort of big step and it may incur some legal liability for me, but I really do think that exposing the existence of this tape and for the public to hear at large what happened 50 years ago is in the public interest. And I'm sick and tired of being roadblocked by the government and by elite institutions who have only an interest in corruption and concealment. And that's why they won't allow the public at large to heed this recording. So we've taken the monumental step and there could be some legal consequences for me after we publish this tape. But we are going to publish this tape and the tape is 42 minutes. It is unedited. It is in its raw form. the form that I received it from the ABC a couple of years ago. But we think it's important in the public interest, in the interest of protecting children, but also to ensure that the true historical record is shown to all Australians. We are going to play the tape in this episode that goes for 42 minutes. And some people have asked us over the last month to do so. I've resisted. thinking that we had other options before us, both legal and political, but we've exhausted all of those possibilities and the lead establishment in this country just wants to bury the history and basically deny Australians the real truth of what's going on. So we're about to play the tape and the public should be fully informed about um what happened back in 1975 yeah two points john the first is that we should just put a warning in here this is a very disturbing piece of media so um just go in with that warning ringing in your ears the other is there is a chance we may not be able to keep this up on the channel for very long so it would be good for people to actually take the opportunity to listen to this content whilst they can but um We think it's really important in the interests of the people to actually table this particular event. It is very disturbing. It is concerning. But nevertheless, it is in the interest of the people. So here it is. Good evening. You're listening to Lateline. This is Richard Neville. Tonight's program is about pederasty, which means the act of sodomy between men. But tonight we're using the term as explicitly defined by the Penguin English Dictionary, that is, the homosexual relationship of a man with a boy, which is not to be confused with pedophilia, a term which implies an assault on a young child by a man. In this studio there are three pederists, men in their thirties who involve themselves in sexual relationships with consenting boys, with them as a teenager who since the age of 12 has enjoyed sex with men. When the subject of pederasty was first considered by Leiplein, in fact following a suggestion by one of the participants in tonight's discussion, of shock, tinged slightly with voyeurism, rippled through us all. The level of curiosity was matched only by the level of ignorance. For despite the blatantly homosexual character of this country, we seem to know more about the pederastic lifestyle of the academies of ancient Greece than we do of Australia today. And while pederasty is openly accepted in other cultures, sometimes as a vehicle of education, in Australia it is not only a serious criminal offence, but a subject greeted by most people with intense feelings of revulsion and disgust. Do these feelings have any foundation? What goes on in a pederastic relationship? Is it corruption of the young or an awakening by them? These are some of the issues we seek to raise in tonight's discussion. In London recently, pederists began to meet together in a group to discuss the nature of their sexuality. This group was infiltrated by two reporters from a Sunday newspaper, The People, which subsequently named the men as, quote, vile child fanciers who formed a bizarre and perverted sex ring. Since the story, the pederasts have been harassed, intimidated and sacked from their jobs. But the group itself has been inundated with inquiries from all over Britain of people wanting to join. A spokesman for the group said that none of them were interested in relationships based on coercion or force and that the only people who know how caring a pederastic relationship can be are the people involved. But, he said, no one takes any notice of a pervert or a child. Well, as far as we know, there is not yet a similar organisation in Australia, and tonight is probably the first time pederasts in this country have spoken about their sexuality publicly. And finally, with apologies for the following overtones of melodrama, we should say that few limitations have been placed on this discussion. Some areas may possibly offend, or even disgust, some listeners, and we ask them that in such a case... you resort to your democratic right to turn off the radio. Well, Stephen, coming to you first, you spend much of your time in the company of young boys. What is it that attracts you to them? Well, it's usually their beauty, and with regard to the young boys as a sort of section of... As a group of people. As a group of people. they're a kind of special, they seem to be a special group. I can see quite clearly where the age, you know, this sort of a phoebic thing of from 14 to, say, 17, you know, is a special sort of being, you know, different from... You see, what fascinates me is that you're often in the company of young boys and yet in mental terms or in terms of their kind of ability to relate socially to outsiders. They don't seem to be particularly interested, and I'm just wondering whether you're in their company for solely genital reasons, and you kind of endure this sort of stultifying boredom just so you can really have a fuck. I have sort of felt that, although I didn't feel I was doing that, but I felt that I was bored with somebody that I was sexually attracted to, but I suppose everybody hasn't. But, no, usually I enjoy, very much enjoy their company. They conversation and just the sort of patterns of the patterns of everything. I can talk to them, discuss things easily with them, and I'd really go. If you compare it, which I guess I have to, you know, because I'm aware that other people have a greater intellectual capacity, you know, say my contemporaries and friends that I see the rest of the time when I'm not seeing young boys, but they, ultimately it doesn't matter what you do with your friends, you only just sort of say what time is it and talk about the weather or something anyway. Well, to sort of throw the discussion open to anyone, it seems to me that when the subject of pederasty comes up, people react with great hostility towards pederists. And I think that this reaction can be pinpointed down to a feeling on the part of non-pederists that by seducing young... Well, first of all, that a relationship between an adult male and and a young male, a boy, must be based on exploitation or an element of seduction. In other words, you are using your superior wisdom, wit, sophistication and education to con young boys into fucking you. Well, it amounts to both, Richard, because you use that to seduce them, but also if you love their beauty and love their youth and their innocence, you also offer them your wisdom and your intelligence. or whatever it is, you offer them that as, you know, for a chance to stay with you, to be with you, or maybe you even offer to corrupt them, but it works both ways. You use it as a way of getting them to go to bed with you, but also you're offering them yourself, because naturally when innocence is so beautiful and profound in front of you and you're just offering everything to that, you let your whole self fall out into those innocent eyes And they take over. It's the tempest completely. Well, apart from bribes... Well, Mark, I don't want to introduce you. You're a young person, so I just want to establish who you are. Go on. Right. Well, apart from the bribes and exploitation, I think that the older people using their wisdom in that way show more understanding and are prepared to listen to the younger person who really appreciate that. So you can feel your... Have you had a... When did you have your first sexual experience with a man? How old? Well, I was 12 years old. Can you describe it for us, just sort of what happened? Yeah, well, I was in the Police Systems Boys Club and I was doing a particular sport. And this fellow happened to be in his mid-twenties and being in the same class as I was. And we became friends and he sort of took me out and shouted me to a good time and listened and understood me. And after an interval at a drive-in, he sort of rubbed me up the right way and we sort of got very quick with down to the nitty-gritty of... Well, what is the nitty-gritty of... What is it? What was it in this case, in any way? Well, he sort of foreplayed in such as he rubbed my thighs and sort of massaged me all over and then took my pants off slowly, which I felt really sexual about because it's so interesting that it was so slow and it was so drawn out and it just sort of built up. And he started sucking my cock and I turned around and did the same thing. It just felt natural to me at the time. And no regret at all for doing it because it was really favorable. So it wasn't a traumatic or freaked out experience for you? No, it wasn't. And because it was a new encounter, I really liked it. And it helped me work out my own priorities as far as other people's sex, their colour and their economic or social backgrounds. Right. I mean, now are you exclusively sort of homosexual or heterosexual in your behaviour? Bisexual. I like both forms, male and female. This was several years ago, this first experience, but do you have a feeling that you were kind of seduced unwillingly into it at all? No, I don't. I had a feeling of apprehension because I knew that it was wrong by society, that I did what I wanted to do and not what society wanted me to do. Right. Okay, well, to bring Colin into it now, you're the only one that hasn't spoken, I mean, how do you feel about the charge that your activities are per se, exploitative because of your superior... You're in a position of power in relationship to younger people. Do you consider this at all in your sexual behaviour? Yes, I realise that I have the upper hand in the situation with a young boy. In actual fact, it usually ends up the opposite way around because my emotions do get carried away to the extent where I fall in love with the boy and if you can call it falling in love... Why did you even say that? Do you even doubt the quality of your passion? No, I don't really. I say that because... Because you expect straight people not to believe that you can fall in love with women? Right, yeah. You liken it to a complete heterosexual activity. It's the same form. In fact, it's probably deeper than that because you have the social stigma against you for being what you are. You're always very, very careful about looking around corners and so forth and making sure the whole thing is a great... It's furtive and secretive. Right, right, right, which doesn't help it. No, but perhaps you're probably a bit more secretive than some of the other people at this table, would you say, just as a matter of choice? I mean, I don't know. Stephen, you're not particularly secretive, are you? You're more active, probably. More active, so. Sure, I'm a very active paedrist, you know. How active is active? Active, I'd say, to the point of a scene of, say, 12 boys and various walks of life, various schools. What, I mean, in a year or? No, at one time, yeah. Oh, well, you You wouldn't count activeness by the number of facts that you'd have. How much time you devote to... Eschewing young boys. So I'm getting back to these 12 kids. Is this in the sort of situation of you being in a room with 12 kids at once kind of thing, or is this just every year you might have 12 different affairs? No, this is sort of in a situation where three may turn up, two may turn up, or one may turn up, but basically it's 12 by 12 by 12 in one year. Right. Scenes do fade, they grow up, they completely reform from the whole thing when they get older. I've not had any yet, I don't think. Why do you say reform, Colin? Well, I say reform because they've gone through that stage of a relationship with me and they feel that because of social stigma and also natural ideas about a girl and wanting to get into the heterosexual scene takes precedence over it and they just sort of leave. But you almost talk as though there's something to reform from. Well, I don't believe there is. But they do believe this and there's no way of you sort of even saying this to them and getting it over. There is some way of reforming. Can I just come in for a second? Have any of you found that boys that you've had scenes with years ago who have now grown up, have any of you discovered that that they are now bitter towards you because you made them have a homosexual relationship in their youth? Yes, yes. You have, really. And do you think their bitterness in their particular cases was justified at all? Oh, no, but not on a sexual ground. It's just because in my particular case, I usually am drawn to relationships that don't last for one or two or three weeks. They'll last for two or three years, and they drain me of everything. I end up suicidal in hospitals and all that other thing. And I use this tremendous intellectual power and offer them all the intellectual things that I have to keep them within, with me, with fear of leaving. And I know the moment the relationship starts that it's going to finish and I live through that terror all the time the relationship is going. I agree. And the last relationship I conducted is still sort of a very bitter thing because I used every device possible, every mesh of having a device possible to me to keep this particular boy with me. You seem to try and get a longer-term relationship. It's what interests me about Stephen, coming back to Stephen for a second, and one criticism that I think one could make is that because of the variety of sexual experience that you have with young boys and the number of different faces one sees you with over the years, one asks, well, are you really capable of permanency, of a sort of a deep human relationship, or are you just kind of having a series of basically one-night stands? Yeah, well, basically, I think that most probably the most delightful sort of really beautiful sexual experiences in my memory were very sort of ephemeral by nature, just passing and almost accidental and once on a beach in the north coast and another time in the mountains and just with young, very young boys because that's the most exciting to me. And theirs was a natural in each of the sort of four or five times. It was definitely a natural experience child's sexual response, you know, an almost, like, mutually initiated sexual experience. Yeah, I think we should talk about this. Who initiates the act? That's something that we should try. One initiates it, of course, you know. One does if one, presumably, at the risk of sounding defensive, I mean, anybody does, a playboy or a... See, what's interesting, I mean, I don't think that we know so much about relationships that sort of older women have with girls. I don't think there's even a word for it. I mean, they just seem to go right back in history this relationship of older men with younger boys and one just thinks of Plato sitting around with his pupils and part of the price that kids in Greece paid for Plato's knowledge was well part of the knowledge was sexual knowledge as well so it's a very long historical activity that you're all involved in and I'm just trying to explore the nature of kind of you know is it uneven really or do you think that kind of children are highly sexed and that they, in a way, seek out a relationship with an older man. Yes, of course they do. They do on buses, they do on the streets of Bondi Junction. A boy gets a buzz on you and it's mutual and you feel this and you feel... And if you sort of stopped and talked to that boy in the street, like I know they did the other night, this 15-year-old boy on the bus and he got off and I got off as well and I was going to sort of talk to him, I knew that all the people on the bus were watching and I knew that... I mean, I was almost to say I was going to sort of grab him on the bus. He was so... so innocent and so beautiful. And, well, of course he was turning me on completely. And he knew he was flaunting his virility and sexuality. I knew he came in the bus. Colin, what is it that attracts you to boys? Well, Richard, I find a boy attractive in much the same way that you and other heterosexual males like yourself find a girl or a woman attractive. Inasmuch as I look at a boy aged 12 to 16, and if he is beautiful, and to qualify the fact beautiful... I'm, from a plethora's point of view, I'm in a boy that may be physically delicious in having perfectly formed limbs, unblemished skin all over his body, being perfectly hairless and smooth, except for just the right amount of pubic hair. A boy that's face is a picture of angelic beauty, a face that shows all that he's thinking, a face that has no fears of expression. I want to hold that boy in my arms, to sleep with him, to Sodom. him, to feel his hurts and joys, to advise him on his problems. It sounds almost like a poem that you've got sort of ingrained in your psyche. One of the first things that strikes me about that is that you're really robbing him of any of the boy's individuality. You are objectifying a fantasy. You are searching for a, quote, a beautiful object and somehow, you know, the real live human with pimples and warps and all completely disappears from your reality. Well, basically, physically yes I'm attracted to a beautiful boy and he must be a beautiful boy for me to be attracted to him I find later on that his mind may be so lovely as his body as lovely as his body I should say and it's all very fine women have been complaining in the last few years that men are sexist because they have objectified the idea of womanhood basically through playboy magazines and so forth completely just holding up the blemishless body as the ideal. Now, it seems to me that you're doing exactly the same thing with children. Would you agree? Yes, but I think what you're doing, as Richard says about you, Colin, that you're objectifying. And I think the reason you're doing this is out of guilt. And I feel that you really don't want to be homosexual, which you don't regard yourself. You regard yourself as a pederist. And so you have these relationships which are so totally beautiful because you really don't want to be involved with the boys at all. I don't see as you having an honourable relationship with the boy at all. I think it's, you know, totally hypocritical that this whole thing is which sounds like a poem and you're robbing the boy's innocence. Well, you could be consoled on one point because it's the kind of thing that doesn't really happen very often, you see, to Colin, I assume, you know, because of the sort of high standard set for this ideal, you know, it really happens very infrequently and then it doesn't really happen, I suppose. It always becomes a kind of disaster. And it's always temporary, even if he meets this perfectly pubertal, spotless boy. I mean, they can only be that way in a good week, isn't it? I was going to finish up by saying that this is... And they're never amenable to the sort of pressures, you know, not subject... This is a fantastic thing, really, because, you know, you're romanticising the instance, all the instances of your life, and you're romanticising it and going... sort of always along and that you know it's not going to ever differ for you you're never going to establish a permanent relationship you'll just be sort of an endless romantic but I still think that it's guilt that makes you decide you're not a homosexual that you're a pederast and that you have anal guilt and rat fear and all that type of thing and that you see boys as objects of such innocence that they're not involved in that and then you can just sort of perpetrate yourself on that well I think that's probably part of the nature of pearistry too, that it's very romantic and maybe just a sort of symptom or a result of all the media thing and the movies and Hollywood and everything like that and the whole romantic idea seems to be imposing that on this strange relationship. Yes, I mean, right Stephen, I agree there. In as far as, I mean, I enjoy the romanticism of a boy affair. I enjoy I enjoy teaching him so much that his father or the absence of a father can't give him. Usually I find that all the boys that I've known over the years either have the absence of a father or a father they would like to have in me. What sort of things do you teach them quite seriously? I mean, do you think that they get from their relationship with you? Well, basically boyish things like riding, shooting, hunting, fishing, anything like that, anything pertaining to boyhood, which they can't find that their father had. Well, that's an objectification, a really heavy one for a start, because a lot of boys are probably interested in reading and listening to music and... Certainly, yes, if they're cultural sort of thoughts or anything like that. Of course, I mean, I can certainly discover these things with them quite capably. But basically, they want to do all the physical things that a boy wants to do at that age, between the age of, say, 12 and 16. A boy. Which is brilliant. When you start out, Sorry, just to pursue Connor for a second with, you know, going on a kind of rather butch weekend with a boy or something. I mean, how soon do you make it apparent to a boy that you have sexual interest in him? I mean, what I'm trying to ask is, is there a stage where the child is conned into basically thinking he's going on a sort of hunting, shooting, butch trip with you and then sort of halfway through the weekend? Yes, yes. There is a desire there straight away that I want to really sleep with that boy. Yeah. Um... I make it fairly obvious in the very beginning of the whole affair, and it's one link. I've only had one occasion where basically I've been with a boy and haven't been off with him for several, several months because I love that boy so much that it would have destroyed the whole relationship anyway. But in the end, the boy felt that the relationship was so strong that to lose me as a friend, he felt that he should get off with me, which he did. And what's the difference between a pederast and a dirty old man? old man is somebody who makes his intentions apparent immediately. Yes, basically. And it appears to somebody who sort of gets them into all kinds of other scenes. And then maybe the boy himself at all. It's a physical thing and just, wham, I'm here one minute and gone the next. Well, that's the boy himself, I'd say. Yes, but talking of the dirty old man... Doesn't that strike any of you as being a bit exploitive to the boy, that you are conning the boy? No, no, not at all. Can I just say that the boys of that age... and naturally commercial in this society or in any society, and if they're going to be given lollies or a Honda or a ride on a motorboat and just have their cock pulled or get off or something, if they're 11 or something, and a bit later on they might want something more. No, it's not exploitive at all because the boys want these particular things that are around them. Well, anyway, Mark, you're the youngest one of all of us by about 12 years. Why don't you comment about that? Well, I think a dirty old man starts He wants sex and that's all he wants. And he just comes straight out and does it roughly. And there's none of these bribes, that's how I put it. And I want those things too. I'd love to have a Honda if I could obtain it through this way. It's only another way of making a Honda and that's really commercial. But at the same time, I do want a relationship friend-wise, mind-wise. Yes. Don't you think that you are risking the day of causing, you know, a trauma in a young boy who hasn't kind of worked out what his sexual instincts are, hasn't he? No, no, no. The boy is going to be traumatised by a son and by the family in any way. Young children don't necessarily know what their sexual predilection is. Boys and young girls get traumatised all the time. By politics, by their family, anything. Even related to boys. Women who have never sort of, you know, might easily be traumatised by the baker. Anybody might be traumatised. But with boys... think it's a particular no because very often they do have a sexuality quite you know a secret sexual life that they would never dream of confining their parents it's impossible although it's quite it's the thing in other societies I believe or for many of you I mean have you ever been got enmeshed in the parents in relation with the parents very frequently yes I have well how do you cope with that I mean what sort of level does that relationship with the mother or the father and if so what level does it conduct anything The consistent things are that the mother is usually well disposed towards me, and very often the father as well. Do they realise that your interest in their children may not be entirely social? Well, frequently the mother might sort of intuit it, but the father wouldn't be, no. Do you feel sometimes uncomfortable that you have to participate in a deception like that? Bored more than... Yes, uncomfortable, I suppose. Are any of you involved in trying to change public attitudes about pederasty? No, I'm not, but I want to make a point here that being involved with the mothers is a very serious point because most of the mothers, most of us in Western society, and that's the only society I know, sort of intimidate the boy in the family, the boy, the sensitive boy, and the boy ends up in the position that he ends up. The father's usually castrated by the mother, and a lot of us, I feel, see our role as to save boys again from the fate that we've suffered, from being castrated and seeing this terrible figure of our father who is absolutely nothing, being knocked down by them, sort of dragging them away from these sort of overbearing mothers who are going to override them with guilt and fear. I think you You see, buried in there is a kind of attitude of hostility, perhaps, towards mothers and perhaps women generally. No, no, no. Do you think that there's an element of misogyny in your make-up? No, there's certainly an anti-maternal thing, but not misogyny. No, not at all. I think I'm misogyny. Colin, have you ever been in national relationships with the parents? With the parents, yeah, many, many times. Has a father ever discovered that you've ever been having a sexual relationship with a son and as a result of that has had it out with you at all? Yes, only, well, actually, yeah, once or twice this has happened. and it's been basically a punch-up, because the father involved was of a labour type, and here you knew that, you know, these fists were only a way of sort of getting out of the whole thing. But, um... Sure, but most of the boys I've known, Richard, um... don't have any relationship with their father at all. And I step in as a big brother. I'm not really old enough to be the father of that particular boy. And I've given that boy all that he wanted from his father. And I've discovered also... another subject, another point, that that boy's been getting off with countless boys at school, that all involved in mutual masturbation and so forth, and even sodomy with each other. And I've found a boy has introduced me to several other boys that he's been getting off with at school, and they just love the whole sexual thing of knowing, for instance, their wealthy poof, we'll call it, that has sort of materialistic things that he may be able to provide for them as well. Yes, again, this inspiration does get rejected. is to this objective level, both by your desire and by the contrary. I don't agree with any of that. I don't agree with any of that. You don't mind, because boys are basically very materialistic in many, many ways. It goes back to what I said previously about your guilt. Do you feel guilty? Have you ever felt guilty about being a pederist, Richard? No, no, no, I don't feel guilty about that. I just feel guilty about everything. I mean, guilt is a naturally Catholic inherited thing that I have, so I feel guilty about all my activities. I'm Catholic. Why haven't any of you... I tell you what, the Catholic boy is the incredibly spunkiest boy I've ever seen in my life. What were you going to say Well, I was going to ask you, why haven't any of you been involved with trying to change society's attitudes towards pederastic activities? Well, we've never thought of it because the first imperative is that you continue your pederastic activities. You have to do it in secret. So if you learn the ways of secrecy, you don't think about it. Is it not a burden to have to conduct your sexual life in secret? No. I imagine it's totally a pleasant additive. What happens when the boys get older, Colin? Well, Well, the boys get older, of course, but they ultimately leave me for, say, a girl. They become completely heterosexual, if you like to call it that. Well, you drive every boy heterosexual. No, I don't at all. You would have liked some man to come along in your life when you were young and drive you heterosexual. That's why you hate being a pederast. That's really what you're saying. That's right. No, I've always tried to keep a relationship going and just try to find out... Whether or not I would be able to cope with a homosexual relationship with a boy as he grew older. But can you conduct any relationship at all without it being in a sort of a militant way? You're on top and the other one's below. Well, I know it's difficult because, really, we had to talk about pederasty objectively, right? Sure. And so you've got all these ideas about that. But, really, you're just sort of speaking... But those dreams come true often. Well, that's arguable. I suppose, yeah, I'm sure they do. I love to guide that boy into what I feel is the best future for him. Okay, you might say, not so much you, but people may say that it's a corrupt thing that I'm doing. But in actual fact, it's not, because that boy will deal with somebody else anyway. He'll be getting off of his hands. What I interrupted for a moment, Colin, I think he should have been in a boarding school, like where I was at, educated and I think you were. I was. The Catholic boarding school where all those priests and brothers and things, how many of them, I don't know, 20%, 70% are pederists and have found their field there in, you know, an absolute glorified area for pederists and where you could just have the boys there and have them at the altar or have them in the dormitory and I can remember at school all the priests used to fuck boys and things like that. Your Yeah, of course. And you don't really want to have your thing out in society like that. You should be in one of those cloister areas where so many pederasts end up and all the boarding schools are there. That's his arena too. This open, so-called open society is his arena, you know, after school's time and in the eastern suburbs and so on. Where do you make contact with children in this society, Stephen? I have no particular place I usually make contact with them, anyway, recently at the sort of houses of other pederasts, other people who sort of, some have enough money, say, to have a house and a bit of a scene and some calling, but I've never known any perfect sort of brilliant... You don't sort of hang around school playgrounds or anything like that? Not yet. Oh, I've done it. I've gone and picked up boys at high schools. Did you know him? Some of his friends of mine that I've known, you know, and driven them home and... driven them some way. And we've talked about what happens to children when they become older. What happens to pederists when they become older? I don't know, but I believe by all accounts that it sort of becomes, you know, the passions might grow a little less, but I think that it's never a particular hassle, no more than for a heterosexual or for... Richard, let's rather know I want to move on. Nabokov's Lolita is 20 years old, as you said yourself, and what happens to a heterosexual when they become old? Some become... Get that. Yes, dirty old men, some sit on browns in rocking chairs. I have a great fear of becoming dirty old men. I want to... Have any of you tried to ask girls what it is that outrages society generally about the idea of pederasty? What do you think that the social animosity boils down to? It seems to me that it boils down to a fear of corruption. No, it doesn't. It originates from the denial of... child sexuality. The denial of child cerebral activity. Denial of child activity. It's still a Dickensian thing, really. The age of consent, the 21 down to 18 and repeatedly to 60, is ridiculous. So you don't think that there is any kind of a magic age barrier where a child becomes sexual? No. When I was about 12, I had such... like sexual relations with my three-year-old nephew. I got into the cot with him. You don't think that that could have freaked him out? It didn't, no. Do you think there is any kind of substance to the charge that a relationship between an older man and a boy is per se exploitive? I'm sorry, I've got to keep coming back to this because this basically is what animates the disapproval of society is because of the superior power, wisdom, talent and sophistication etc. of the older person and you've already mentioned earlier wealth and money and the criminal bribery. That's a paradox. It's an exploitive situation. That is totally a paradox because for one thing when you confront a boy if you're knocked out by a boy you are immediately the victim of that boy in a sense. But only if you feel and you've already spoken that your things are fairly ephemeral. So I mean you're sort of a victim of a temporary lust but really if the boy has yet undefined his sexual predilection, couldn't he be the victim of your already hard attitudes? If you like to put it that way, he's a victim of your amazing interest. He's a victim because you're interested in maybe the things that he's got to say and you fall prey to him. That's what it's more like, the feeling that you fall prey to a boy if you're lucky enough to meet a beautiful boy and alright, you're fascinated by what he's got to say. So he starts to talk and then, of course, he's knocked over by the idea that you're this grand person who's able to understand and interact with him. Interestingly... My theory there is that we become the victims because the boy still has life ahead of them. All of adolescence and all of early manhood and we become the victims because we're looking back on youth and wanting to recapture it and gain it and recapture the feeling of being, feeling the expectations of life. So we become... The traditional idea of victim is always that you're moving in on the sacred area of virginity, you know. But that's a sort of hangover. Virginity is just an illusion. It's a Victorian morality thing. Mark, have you ever felt that you've been corrupted or in a situation where you were being exploited by an older person's power? No, I don't, because I feel that to work out whether you're heterosexual or homosexual, you must try both to work out what you are or where your priorities stand. I think doing either one of these opens or makes you more aware of the avenues of life, and it's helped me greatly decide what I want first. Well, I think the polarisation of homosexual and heterosexual is just like communist and capitalist, really. It's just... some kind of panic about morality because it's just sort of undifferentiated sexuality and children are the perfect example because they have that integration and they respond immediately to anything sexually and everybody's known surely that they can respond to anything even music in a sort of sexual way I want to get back to the point why society condemns so much and it's been answered quite fully I think but I think that the reason is because children and not only just denied their sexuality, they denied their political thought, they denied any social activity, they denied, well, they're even taxpayers, but they can't vote. And they're sent to schools and they've been conditioned. They denied everything. They're not people, they're non-people. They're in ghettos, like blacks or whoever you like to mention. Sure. And that's why society can't see, oh, that young man, they couldn't be fucking each other and they don't even think in those terms. But if they have to consider an older man playing around with someone who they regard who has no status in society, no opinions, no attitudes, and certainly the right to vote, they regard that as a big bloody thing. Well, they just can't believe that an older man will want to have anything to do with his non-person. That's how I see it. That's very, very important. And if that can be erased, well, then youth can become much more valuable. Well, why aren't their youth sitting in the parliaments? Look at the way the Parliament's carrying on the moment in Australia. Why isn't there anyone under 43 or something hanging around Parliament House? I mean, the substance of what you're saying is a pederasty for the child can almost be a sort of process of liberation because it's a contact with an adult culture. Well, I know it's happened with the boys that I've been involved with. They've become different people, or the potential is always there because I'm drawn to that type of thing, and their mind grows and they go out. Well, everybody's mind grows and they go out, presumably, yeah. Yeah, but sometimes... they grow and grow in because they're denied their privilege of being a human being when they're young. And this being a human being when they're young is their sexuality. It's true that the pederasties are pretty inevitable kind of thing in just about, I don't know, a very great many boys' lives that they will encounter it, especially if they're attractive. Stephen, do you think that, look, this whole thing of pederasties and fucking boys and things exists in an elite society, a wealthy society, a cultural society among those queens that wealthy or who are in the academy or whatever? Do you think it exists elsewhere? I think it's on every level. I've seen it among seasonal workers on two occasions. I've met different groups of seasonal workers and I've seen it there, I've seen it in factories, I've seen it in football teams. I mean, you know, just everywhere. The incidence is right through society as well. Have any of you been caught up with the law at all? Yes, I have, Richard. I was an Englishman. last year, and I happened to fall in love, we'll call it to be a little romantic with the whole thing, which is true. And the whole relationship went for, say, six months. And the boy was totally engrossed in me, I was totally engrossed in him. And through incredible circumstances, the parents found out that this relationship was going on between the boy and myself. And straightaway, without any thought of repercussions toward the boy, and his mental outlook and the whole thing, they summoned the law and they had me charged with the whole thing, thinking in a naive way that the law would deal with me within a few days and I'd be locked up and that'd be the end of me. In actual fact, I appeared not guilty of the whole offence and it went on and on through three, four courts. Now, by the end of those four courts, the boy was totally wrecked. and I was proved not guilty, and the boy needed incredible psychiatric treatment after this, not through the relationship between the boy and I, but through the law. The trauma of the law becoming involved in his parents, the violence from his parents. Exactly, Richard. And in actual fact, the parents at the time were split. They'd remarried the father and the mother, and the boy was really incredibly, what shall we say? Vulnerable? Yes, very vulnerable. because he was torn between his mother and his father and didn't know which way to go, I came along and offered him a security which he wanted in as far as he had a permanent relationship with a person, which was me. But Colin, you started to manipulate unscrupulously in that family. In going between the father and the mother. You moved the boy from the custody of his father to his mother for your own convenience and so on. I don't know how you can say... No, you're quite... This is from what you've told me. Steve, that's quite wrong because I knew that the boy was getting nowhere with his father and he was given... He was granted custody. The father was granted custody of the boy eight years ago by the courts. And he was getting nowhere with his father. His father was an ignorant, arrogant bastard of a guy, really. A labourer, a gardener, or whatever he was. Maybe your attitude to the father is based on a kind of jealousy, that you really want to play the father role with these children. There's no father who could be a good father in your eyes. So you won't have to admit to our pederast. I think that many times pederasties have been victimised in the courts. in that way, you know, by being dragged through and the boy has been betrayed and embarrassed and the whole thing has been unfruitful, you know. Certainly. But not particularly in this case. The way the whole thing came about that I was really exposed is because the boy felt that the whole relationship between he and I was so relaxed that he told his stepbrother. And his stepbrother was most horrified of the whole situation and just told the mother and the father. Well, that's what frequently happens. The boy will tell in confidence. Yes. But that concept will be betrayed immediately in the name of the prevailing morality, which is that you can do anything. Anything is okay. Betray anybody's word to protect the non-existence of children. That whole idea that they don't have any sexuality. Aren't you all condemned to a kind of treadmill of just making playground contact with children that will have a temporary relationship with them? They're going to grow up. What do you want to do? I don't do that. What do you do, Stephen? I remain friends with the boys for many, many years and maybe forever. I don't know how femoral friendships are in other people's lives, but anyway, many of mine last sort of, all have lasted for 20 years and so on, boys that I've begun by fancying and then subsequently had a sexual relationship with. Do you think you're in pursuit of a sort of an unholy grail that doesn't even exist? It was designed to shoot as a whole. But fancy, for a revolutionary, Richard, what a ridiculous question to ask. What do you expect us to want? A house in Mossman with a boy and antique furniture? At the last point, in the last couple of weeks in Sydney, there's been this report, well, it was initially reported as a brutal, homosexual or pederastic murder of a three-year-old boy. I think subsequently in the coroner's court, it turned out that the boy was not assaulted. But from time to time, in the papers, there is a report of an outrageous, murder of a child by an older man for perverted sexual reasons. Now, do you think, as pederists, what goes through your mind when you read a story like that? Yes, well, the Australian press and Western press is naturally chauvinistic, not necessarily about pederistry or homosexuality, about anything. It was chauvinistic about you and Germaine Greer, and it is at the moment being about Jim Cairns. I want to go deeper than that. How How do you as Pedro's feel when you see that there is a blatant kind of, you know, homosexual murder of a young child? I feel insecure. Right, I just, yeah, yeah. Why is that? Because I feel a kind of implicit indictment in it, you know, about myself and my... Of your lifestyle. Yes, because at times when I am, you know, it could be said that I'm manipulating, but I just really do insist that I'm interacting, you know, with a young boy. Well, I don't know if you here would regard yourself as child molesters. No way. No, definitely not. Why are you even asking that? No, but I do. I am in the business of defending dirty old men or even murderers. Time's run out. Thank you very much for coming and discussing. Thank you very much. Thank you. ¶¶ Thank you.

Invisibility Cloak

Oh, poor losers, didn’t you think anyone would find out. That’s why I, you, we, can hear voices but can never see anyone. I heard a sound in the kitchen, I’ll go and have a look, oh, no one there, must’ve imagined it. They just have to sit in a corner and wait till you go to sleep, then they can get around, spike your coffee and copy your passwords, delete files from your computer, rape you, dose of rohypnol, then they walk out in the morning when it’s convenient. You have to walk around with a broom and literally “Sweep” the whole house, all the empty spaces, the ceiling and upstairs places, shut all the doors as you go and check each room individually, because there could be a dirty little, rat mongrel bastard, squatting in the corner of the room. You horrible little shits, you are now , officially, DEAD MEAT.

Just type in “invisibility cloak” in YouTube

Trans Dimensional Matters of the Heart

It was a pleasant, almost balmy Monday night, nothing much stirred save for the occasional visitor to the next door neighbours back yard. Becoming used to the almost incessant visits by enquiring or disturbed individuals did become quite commonplace and had lost most of it’s quaint , once genial charm. It had long gone past midnight and his imagination roamed the corridors of his mind, he fixed his attention to the faux lace curtains that hung down in front of the sliding windows, the roller blind was up and he could peer through the gloom of the night to see into the backyard at times or fix his attention on the curtains. He let himself slide into an almost trance like state and his eyes defocused upon the fixed location of his view. There it was, where once the lace curtains had been, draped in front of the window, now appeared the underlying static energy field of the curtain, a three dimensional viewpoint of the matrix that comprised that section of the curtain. Four perfectly formed spherical balls hung in the air, shimmering with latent intent, but of no threat to any form. It was beautiful to behold, it had been thirty years since he had last gazed upon the Quantum field and it’s image had always remained ingrained upon his memory, he stared at the two dimensional balls that suspended themselves in a perfect 3 dimensional square. Four simple dots on the lace curtain, access the quantum realm, and bobs your uncle, you have the three dimensional energy matrix that underpins our perception of reality. He did not stay long in the field, there were other pressing matters to be entertained and seen too and he disregarded the curtains for a short while. He wondered if he should perhaps gaze at the intrinsic nature of the top of the curtain, he entertained the thought and it was suggested that perhaps not the top section of the curtain, could be hazardous in that quadrant of the field, too busy, keep it simple stupid, the old KISS principle. Someone did say that whatever I did, don’t change any of the energy structures in the field, don’t change anything basically, not that he knew if it was possible or not but he never bothered, too risky, could crush reality in that time space dimensional sector of the curtain. He lounged back after a while, pleased that once again he had been able to gaze upon the fabric of reality and considered the matter intensely. At some point during this time, gazing into space, he was slightly intrigued to see a ghostly apparition appear, a hand seemingly passing through the glass, pushing the curtain in somewhat and waving his hand back and forth, “Just testing the air”, the ethereal voice replied to his mental questioning , “Psychic enquirer”. He had been gassed twice this week and did not want to overdo it on the deadly gas intake, too much can slow you down. He did raise himself slightly to observe the ghostly hand more closely, he was pleased to see that it was not attached to a body and realised it was his old friend Thing, a pretty good natured trans dimensional entity from the fifth dimension, pretty much a boyhood companion. Thing moved on and things were quiet until Flash Gordon arrived, not quite the cartoon character but more so a shadow entity, you only glimpsed them for a fraction of a second, move at the speed of light, which is almost a contradiction of terms since Flash is a Shadow Wraith, fourth or fifth dimension, travel between realities, all that sort of thing. He left quite soon after arriving and stopping for a moment to engage in some friendly banter, “Are you still the fastest loser in the Galaxy Flash, you spun out meth head”, “Gee whiz Henry Banwell, your insults are still hopelessly inadequate, gotta go, things to do, people to haunt and all that sort of thing, be well my friend”, and disappeared, as they say, in a flash. Things settled down for a while till the Hardings appeared in their backyard to begin their nightly worship of the great Owl God, Babylonian I think, Moloch, same one that the Bilderberg group worship in Bohemian grove, some bullshit like that. This had only become a recent event, perhaps even more surprising than seeing a hand come through your window, and he watched as the two elderly pensioners got down on all fours and bowed to their God, Moloch, that was what was said, he wasn’t too certain of the exact details, who they were actually bowing too, probably didn’t matter, not in Donald anyway. He watched them for a while and wondered if they were going to perform chanting or ritual child sacrifice, he wouldn’t have been surprised any which way, so he sat back down to await the next trans dimensional entity or strange event.

“diselusion.com The Moloch Owl God is one such figure, steeped in history and mystique. 🌌 In ancient times, Moloch was often associated with child sacrifice and worship, primarily in the Biblical account”, taken from the net.

A while later he heard he heard a question, “Who’s orchestrating this event, all these voices, who’s responsible”, perfectly honest question, and the enquirer received an answer, “It is the Universe you fools, who do you think can do all this and more, did you think it was perhaps NASA, no, I am teaching you all a lesson, before your planet is destroyed and you sink into chaos, what did you think was going to happen when you let someone inject mRNA into your blood, an untested drug that had not passed clinical trials, yes. the Swarm put the hit on your planet and your population, too many people, too little resources, little time left, but there is still a chance”, and so the Universe droned on, changing voices, howling around houses and teaching people, if they listened. As the night progressed and the teaching Masters disappeared to evade the dawn, he awaited the rising of the Sun, it had been a pretty good night and he had caught up with some old friends. He wrote down his notes and settled down to await the nights activities.

Costellos, 52 Kellet St. Kings Cross

4:55 AM (14 minutes ago)

to me

541 - Attorney-General - ROYAL COMMISSION INTO THE NSW POLICE SERVICE— PAEDOPHILIA EVIDENCE—CHILD PROTECTION ENFORCEMENT AGENCY

Nile, Fred to the Attorney General, and Minister for Industrial Relations

(1)        Has the Royal Commission into the NSW Police Service handed over to the Child Protection Enforcement Agency (CPEA) all material on members of the judiciary and legal profession alleged, by victims and witnesses, to be involved in paedophilia or pedastry, for example, the evidence given by the witness code named KR5 that he saw a judge at the boy brothel Costello's?

Bill Heffernan (NSW, Liberal Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

I rise today for chapter 1 of what will take many hours. I recently have been given an order

to produce documents to the McClellan Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to

Child Sexual Abuse to justify my making a case to the royal commission, which is doing

excellent work and is discovering things on the public record about the treatment of and

behaviour towards children in our institutions—which a lot of us have known about for 50

years; most people have chosen to look the other way and ignore—that we have the same

problem, I think, in the institution of the law as well as in the institutions of our churches et

cetera.

I was given an order to produce, and I produced, documents to justify my case to the

McClellan royal commission. I have some of those documents here. The notations from the

royal commissioner are on the documents. This one I am holding up here, for instance,

asks, about boys picked up by judge so-and-so, 'Were they Marcellin College students?' This

is a police intelligence document that says, 'A certain judge used to pick up boys in the

toilets opposite Marcellin College.' That particular judge, by the way, gave a sentence of

'found guilty till the rising of the court' to a person who was charged with serious sexual

offences. He also allowed a father who was abusing his foster children and whom he found

guilty in a closed court, with names suppressed, to go back to the family home. That is that

particular judge.

I want to make the case that there is clearly a need—and I intend to get a senior legal

opinion—for the inclusion in the terms of reference for the royal commission, under

'institution', the institution of the law. We also need a federal judicial commission. In

estimates the other day, the Attorney-General said we do not need a federal judicial

commission because there is no endemic corruption in the federal law system. I said to

him, 'Well, does that mean there is in New South Wales,' because New South Wales does

have the very, very successful Judicial Commission of New South Wales, which does

everything from educating judges on sentencing to being a speed camera in the system for

this behaviour. Of course, I did not get a sensible response to that: 'It's a different

jurisdiction,' et cetera.

Within the federal jurisdiction, I have pointed out the behaviour of one Dr Rikard-Bell, who

has given 2,000 opinions as an expert to the Family Court. The Family Court system in

Australia is broken. There are a lot of things that go on in there, with partners dividing and

accusations of sexual misbehaviour within the family, especially the fathers. This guy, who

has given 2,000 opinions as an expert to the court, says in an interview with the ABC,

which I would like to table, that he has no real expertise. In fact, he was instructed by a

man, Dr Richard Gardner—who has since suicided, by the way—that Dr Rikard-Bell

recommends as an opinion maker, and who said:

... the child has to be helped to appreciate that we have in our society an exaggeratedly

punitive and moralistic attitude about adult-child sexual encounters ...

This is the guy giving advice to Dr Rikard-Bell. This Dr Rikard-Bell insists on interviewing

children in front of the offending fathers. How is that for intimidation? And so it goes on.

So there is a serious problem in the Family Court. I now have on my desk in my office a pile

which is nearly a foot thick of correspondence from parents, especially mothers, who have

been mistreated, as they see it, in the Family Court. I just think the Family Court needs

sorting out, but I do not have time to go through the particular detail.

I have here also police documents that every Attorney-General, from Philip Ruddock to now,

has seen. The present Attorney-General has not been delivered these documents; he saw

some of them in a Senate hearing in Melbourne, where I was not allowed to table them.

This goes to why we need a federal judicial commission and why we should include the

institution of the law in the terms of reference of the royal commission. This is a police

document, from the Child Protection Enforcement Agency—I will not name anyone—to the

Commissioner of Police New South Wales, with a date: 'The attached report relates to

Justice'—the name is deleted—'who has emerged prominently during my investigations to

date. Much of the information is hearsay and not capable of being sustained, but collectively

it paints a disturbing picture of a senior member of the legal profession who may or may

not have committed criminal offences but who certainly, in my view, is open to

compromise,' which is the serious issue. It goes on: 'In the circumstances, I feel no

alternative but to seek your permission to carry out a sustained surveillance operation

against this target. I do not take this decision lightly in view of Justice'—deleted

name's—'high profile, but I feel that based on similar evidence I would have little hesitation

in carrying out such an operation against any other member of the public. For such reasons,

I do not think that this particular person should be treated any differently, though I

recognise the matter must be handled with acute sensitivity. I am of the view that such an

investigation would serve a dual purpose. Primarily, it may provide evidence of criminal

offences committed against young boys aged under 18. There is certainly strong suspicion

of such activity. Secondly, it may yield evidence of inappropriate behaviour which, whether

or not it constitutes a criminal offence, would leave the judge open to compromise and

ought to be reported to the appropriate legal body'—very important words. It continues:

'Such consideration was singularly absent from the suspicion surrounding Justice Yeldham,'

and I will name him, 'which consequently did not show either the police or the legal

profession in a good light. I believe this action is defensible on those grounds alone. Subject

to your approval, I intend to take personal command of the operation under the auspices of

Strike Force Cori.'

I also raised in estimates the other day another police document, with a list of people. I am

not going to name anyone on this list. I note that royal commissioner Justice Wood said he

does not recall this document at the time, even though it is his document, signed off by

Gary Crooke QC. It is addressed to the New South Wales Police Service and it is a list of

alleged paedophiles. A person known to the commission compiled the list involving

paedophilia. The list details his knowledge of activities—these are only allegations—and at

the back there are surveillance issues.

To give an idea of the intensity of this: the first person on the list is a former Prime

Minister; the second person is a political party heavyweight; the next person is a very

senior business person; the next person is a senior judge; the next person is a Supreme

Court master; the next person is Justice Yeldham, who, sadly, has passed away. He should

not have suicided. Everyone knew what he was up to. The next guy on the list is a local

court magistrate; the next guy is a former president of the Law Society; the next one is

John Marsden, who has passed away; the next one is a judge, the guy who used to go to

Marcellin College; the next guy is a QC; the next guy is a barrister; the next guy is a

barrister; the next guy is a barrister; the next guy is a barrister; the next guy is a QC; the

next guy is a barrister; the next guy is a QC; the next guy is a senior partner of a law firm;

the next guy is a senior solicitor of a law firm; the next guy is a barrister's clerk—and so it

goes on.

These are police documents. The Wood royal commission, in volume 4, said they were

disturbed at the way files were mismanaged and the contents were lost. Sadly, I have a lot

of the contents from the lost files and I have had them for some time. They were delivered

to me on a bench in the botanic gardens. I think it is absolutely essential that we, the

Australian people, give serious consideration to why we should have a judicial commission

and why we should get the royal commission, which is doing a fantastic job, to include this

in its terms of reference.

I have talked about Costello's, the boy brothel, and Porky's. Some of the people who

attended those are noted here. The police were on the payroll. They would ring up

Costello's, the boy brothel, and say, 'We're coming to raid you.' They were being paid. I can

name the coppers that were getting the money. The police are seriously compromised. For

someone like me, who has all this knowledge, even though you could get smashed for

talking about—it would be derogatory—I do not think it would be responsible to not try and

do something about it.

I have a police letter here saying that there was a guy who represented Philip Bell, a

notorious paedophile, under a false name in court. I wrote to the police and said, 'Why

haven't you arrested him?' They said: 'It's only evidence from the royal commission. We

would have to have another investigation. Evidence from the royal commission may not be

admissible in a prosecution. We would have to have our own investigation.' I am advised

the prosecution always retains a discretionary power not to proceed—in other words, a

cover-up. This is a lawyer who represented—

You’ve Already Seen This Charmer

Find it on Structural Analysis, Report 6:49 23 Feb 2025 6+4+9+2+3=24=2+4=6 2025 2+2+5=9 6+9=15 1+5=6 6+6=12=1+2=3, Pterodactyl, Vicksburg, Mississippi, in 1864-1

Looks Like a Pterodactyl

Yeah, that’ll do, may as well get them as well, fucking birds, looks good on my wall though, don’t you think Caruthers?

Lucky Last?

Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat Rocky.

Pterodactyl, Vicksburg, Mississippi in 1864

Gee whiz, the numbers sure do go up, don’t they boys.

Pterodactyl in Vicksburg, Mississippi, 1864-2

Good job boys, got another one.

Pity He Didn’t Float Away

Oh, what’s the matter, did they lie to you, they wouldn’t have done that would they.

TR-3B

Just thought I’d throw in a curve ball, Donald.

1 in 10

1 in 10 men, Donald, that means there are potentially, approximately, 100 paedophiles who have had sexual interactions with someone under the age of 18, in Donald.

Hello Duckies

Guess who’s coming to town?

Crunching The Numbers

Just another stat, Donald, do you like me crunching the numbers now, losers.

How Many In Donald

Well Donald, how many of the putrid dogs are there in Donald?

Slag Putrid Dogs In Donald

Friday night, 10/10/25, 10 pm approximately, I awoke after a snooze and received a notification from the bank querying a transaction made from Hong Kong on my credit card, I declined the transaction and cancelled my credit card. Saturday morning I arose at about 4 am and began some light study. At about 9 am I noticed a strange smell and felt drowsy and dozed off for an hour, afterwards I had a splitting headache and tightness in the upper chest, this had also happened a week earlier on the Saturday previously when I had noticed an intense chemical smell, I had then opened the window and found it was much stronger outside my window, eventually I had to collapse into bed with intense chest pains and unable to breathe properly, it took me about 3 days to recover, then the next Saturday,11/10/25, it happened again, incidentally while I was watching documentaries into Australian paedophiles and went outside to have a nap in the sun. I thought at one stage I heard my back door closing quietly but as I had my back to the door and was half asleep, I did not notice anything amiss. When I awoke after going inside to lay down on my bed at about 4 pm, I went to take my emphysema puffer medication and found that it had been stolen. I had taken it that very morning at about 4 am and had just bought a new dosage the previous Friday, 10/10/25. I then heard the local criminal group known as The Barleycorn, led by Peter Fielder/Fielding, laughing and shouting, that they were going to watch me suffer and die, I was fortunate enough to find some old asthma medication which they had missed and if that suffices, I may not have to ring the ambulance. The person responsible for jumping the back fence while I was dozing in the sun from John Harding’s house was Louis Mackervalle. I don’t know if that’s his name or if Peter ‘Slag’ Fielder is his real name but that’s what was reported to me by one of their other victims in Donald, an elderly lady who had been abused, stood over and robbed by the putrid slag paedophile dogs known as The Barleycorn.

John Barleycorn Goodbye

There was three kings into the east,
Three kings both great and high,
And they hae sworn a solemn oath
John Barleycorn should die.

They took a plough and plough'd him down,
Put clods upon his head,
And they hae sworn a solemn oath
John Barleycorn was dead.

But the cheerful Spring came kindly on,
And show'rs began to fall;
John Barleycorn got up again,
And sore surpris'd them all.

The sultry suns of Summer came,
And he grew thick and strong;
His head weel arm'd wi' pointed spears,
That no one should him wrong.

The sober Autumn enter'd mild,
When he grew wan and pale;
His bending joints and drooping head
Show'd he began to fail.

His colour sicken'd more and more,
He faded into age;
And then his enemies began
To show their deadly rage.

They've taen a weapon, long and sharp,
And cut him by the knee;
Then tied him fast upon a cart,
Like a rogue for forgerie.

They laid him down upon his back,
And cudgell'd him full sore;
They hung him up before the storm,
And turned him o'er and o'er.

They filled up a darksome pit
With water to the brim;
They heaved in John Barleycorn,
There let him sink or swim.

They laid him out upon the floor,
To work him farther woe;
And still, as signs of life appear'd,
They toss'd him to and fro.

They wasted, o'er a scorching flame,
The marrow of his bones;
But a miller us'd him worst of all,
For he crush'd him between two stones.

And they hae taen his very heart's blood,
And drank it round and round;
And still the more and more they drank,
Their joy did more abound.

John Barleycorn was a hero bold,
Of noble enterprise;
For if you do but taste his blood,
'Twill make your courage rise.

'Twill make a man forget his woe;
'Twill heighten all his joy;
'Twill make the widow's heart to sing,
Tho' the tear were in her eye.

Then let us toast John Barleycorn,
Each man a glass in hand;
And may his great posterity
Ne'er fail in old Scotland!